Keyperson Cover:
By Lee Davy, Director, Rebroke,
www.rebroke.com/corporate, 01270 211311
Who is a key person?
A key person is anyone whose death or disability would have a serious effect on
the company's future profits. Some companies will have several key individuals.
Others only one, but to identify who is key requires a thorough understanding of
the business itself. In some cases, it may be immediately apparent that the majority
shareholder and figurehead of the company is the only key person. In other cases,
one of the directors may be key despite only being a minority shareholder. The size
of an individual's shareholding level is not necessarily a good indicator of who
is a key person, as a non shareholding employee could easily be a key person to
the business.
How much cover is required?
There are no specific rules when assessing the financial value of a key person.
Each key person must be dealt with on his or her own merits. Insurable interest
must be demonstrated, and there are several options available to guide you in assessing
a reasonable amount of cover. These are outlined below:
Multiple of profits -This is the primary method for calculating a key person's
worth. The normal multiples are :
2 x gross profit or 5 x net profit, The profit may need to be split where there
is more than one key person and higher multiple may be justified for a rapidly expanding
business
Multiple of salary - A multiple of gross salary including benefits in kind
can give a useful guide to the amount needed to buy a replacement. Up to 10 x gross
salary may be considered. The disadvantage of this method is that, for other than
non-shareholding employees an accurate measure of a key person's worth to the business
may not be related to his or her remuneration.
Loan Security - The outstanding loan will need to be covered (divided between
the relevant key people as appropriate). Management buyout - as in loan security
the amount at risk, should they lose the key person, must be calculated
Tax Implications
The key person
On the basis that the company is the owner and the key person is simply the life
assured, then there are no benefit in kind or other taxation implications on the
individual. If however, the company subsequently chooses to pay out the proceeds
to the individual or their family then tax implications would arise on that event.
The company
There are two aspects to consider - paying the premiums and receiving the proceeds
Tax implication on paying the premiums
There is no specific provision in the tax legislation that guarantees corporation
tax relief for the company. Instead, principles for the tax treatment were actually
set out in 1944 by the Chancellor, Sir John Anderson.
This statement indicates that the proceeds will generally be taxable and the premiums
tax deductible where:
The life assured is an employee
Thus no tax relief is likely on premiums where the life assured is a shareholder.
Working directors (although not shareholding directors) are considered as employees.
The logic behind this is that to be tax allowable , premiums must be "wholly and
exclusively for the purposes of trade". Where a plan is written on the life of a
shareholder, there is considered to be an element of self interest in taking out
the plan ( i.e. preserving your own shareholding value) and therefore the wholly
and exclusively test can be failed
The insurance is to meet a reduction in profits resulting from the loss of services
of the key individual
For example, consider a company which borrows money to buy a factory. If the company
then takes out a key person plan to repay the loan on that person's death. Then
the plan would not meet this criteria. It is being taken to repay the loan and not
meet loss of profits.
It is annual or short term insurance
Short term is not clearly defined but is generally considered to be plans of no
more than five years
Summary
Many if not most plans will fail one or more of these tests and therefore the premiums
will not be deemed to be tax deductible for the company
Receiving proceeds
If tax relief is not permitted on premiums then as a general rule of thumb the proceeds
should not be treated as a trading receipt
It is important to establish this before taking out cover , since if the proceeds
are to form part of the trading receipts and are liable to corporation tax, then
a company could find that they have insufficient funds available after tax to meet
their needs.
If proceeds are to be taxed then the initial sum assured will need to be increased
to take this into account
Conclusion
It is clear that taxation treatment depends on the facts of a particular case and
the practice of the local Inspector of Taxes
Accordingly, we it is recommended that when a key person plan is being proposed,
the company accountants or tax advisers write to the company's inspector of taxes
to gauge his view on the taxation circumstances. Whilst a binding decision on taxation
will not be forthcoming, a good indication on the likely tax outcome will be gained.